Choose by pressure, proof, and boundary.
Start with the decision your team needs to make: reduce wasted seats, inspect a Jira group before changing it, or preserve evidence from a JSM request.
Each lane has a team pressure, an output artifact, and an explicit boundary.
Output: savings scan and cleanup preview. Boundary: estimates, not billing guarantees.
Output: detected impact, recorded plan, Recheck, and selected Watch. Boundary: read-only and coverage-aware.
Output: receipt, manifest, source status, and caveats. Boundary: no invented proof.
At-a-glance comparison
Each app has a different job, output, and boundary. That makes the right next click faster for admins and reviewers.
Group Cleanup Radar
Jira group cleanup risk and change verification
Request Evidence Control for JSM
JSM evidence handoffCompare the apps
The important difference is not the UI theme. It is the job, the user, and the review artifact each app produces.
Start here if
Use the first true sentence. The product route should feel obvious before anyone reads a long feature list.
Start with License Guard.
Group change firstA Jira group may be deleted, replaced, retired, renamed, or monitored.Start with Group Cleanup Radar for Jira.
Proof firstA JSM request needs a durable record of what was reviewed.Start with Request Evidence Control for JSM.
Questions before choosing
Which product should I start with?
Use License Guard for wasted Jira seats and renewal cleanup. Use Group Cleanup Radar to inspect detected group cleanup risk before a Jira change and Recheck supported paths afterward.
When should I use Request Evidence Control for JSM?
Use it when a JSM request needs an evidence handoff that shows what was reviewed, what was missing, and what was accepted.
Do these products make blind changes?
No. License Guard is preview-first by default, Group Cleanup Radar is read-only by design, and Request Evidence Control for JSM preserves limitations instead of turning missing evidence into proof.